Meeting Number Two

Meeting #2 - (as with most things, none of this is conclusive)

(this mode of recording is pretty boring, I still think we should video tape our conversations)

We discussed the fact that greed should be alright if it is for necessity.

That at the age of 25, the frontal lobe is fully developed and therefore people should not drink, etc. before hand because it may disrupt it's development. This means that any real decisions we make can only be rational after the ago of 25 (we should not go in time out?)

Nature v. Nurture: parents lead their children to their beliefs and future decisions (it's always the parents' fault).

We developed the idea of the "Tangent Table" which could be a way to let debates pan out without intervention.

--If God = Infinite; god can not be all powerful and all knowing, because you can not have power over things which you will know to happen.

You can't really be in the present -Praxiological -Economics is the pinnacle of human society?

Human nature never changes - human nature is static. -humans are the social animal

Should we discuss the unknown? Existentialism?

~It is ALL philosophy (natural philosophy, etc.)

-The only way to go through life is to not have any beliefs. -philosophy is innate and intrinsic.

Transcendentalism?

Civil Liberties (hands off)/ Civil Rights (what the govt. should provide)

nature? humans that are in enclosed area's (no genetic drift?) are unnatural?

-humans can think and change.

-sustainability of humanity.

Bell Curve of the human population (exponential increase=chaos?)

(I wish I had that conversation on video; what are other ideas on how to retain the stuff talked about?) I can always get into a flow and work with this stuff, but I can never hold it. I guess it's good so that we can all be open-minded, but I don't know.

I am no real philosopher, but I think we all should be.